The vaccine, two years on

Yes, I took the COVID-19 vaccine. Three shots of the Pfizer formulation, in fact. I’m as fully-vaccinated as the any abundantly-cautious person could wish, after having grave misgivings when the vaccine was first available. My biggest concern was the use of aborted children in vaccine development.

In the end, I found a statement from the American bishops persuasive. It made two points, grossly oversimplified here (so I hope you’ll read their statement in full): 1) We need to push for ethical medical research and development, and using babies as research fodder isn’t ethical. 2) The circumstances of the current pandemic justify the use of the vaccines available, some of which are less objectionable than others.

I recall the release of Dignitas Personae by the Vatican Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in 2008, when the papacy was held by Benedict XVI, now Pope Emeritus. He was not known as squishy on the right to life. The document included a statement on the use of vaccines using cell lines of “illicit origin:” “danger to the health of children could permit parents to use a vaccine which was developed using cell lines of illicit origin, while keeping in mind that everyone has the duty to make known their disagreement and to ask that their healthcare system make other types of vaccines available.”

I paid attention to the first part of that sentence when I first read it, without doing anything about the second. Now, on this platform that amounts to little more than a whisper, I’m catching up.

I want the CDC and everyone else concerned with vaccines to know I that I want an end to drug research and testing using cell lines originally derived from aborted children. Or you can call them aborted human fetuses, if “children” pains you.

“Too late,” I’m warned by some fellow Catholics, who think I’ve already cooperated with evil by accepting the Covid vaccine. As a back-pew Catholic with no formal training in moral theology, and in spite of some skepticism of authority, my decision was to get the vaccine because of what seemed at the beginning of the COVID pandemic to be unique urgency. Losing a friend to COVID was a factor. So was witnessing what the disease did to friends, both during the acute phase and in the weeks and months afterward.

What I did not find persuasive, then or now, were pleas from most medical professionals. I’ve spent too many decades listening to various health care providers’ opposition to pro-life public policies. I’ve listened to too many medical pros testify against conscience protections for colleagues who decline to participate in abortion. I’ve listened to physicians who serve in the legislature vote against protection for children who survive attempted abortion.

I’m hearing now about vaccine skepticism and about how members of this-or-that group are stubbornly refusing to get vaccinated. I hear about public service campaigns to reassure people about the relative safety of the vaccines as opposed to getting COVID.

I’ll never know the answer to this, but I have to wonder: how many people are skipping the vaccine because they don’t trust the medical profession? How much mistrust comes from seeing health care providers promote the direct intentional termination of human life?

Open Book: Waugh on Campion

This post appeared on the blog in a slightly different version in December 2016.

Evelyn Waugh, better known for his fiction, turned his hand to biography to celebrate St. Edmund Campion, Jesuit priest and English Elizabethan martyr. Waugh wrote in the Preface to 1935’s Saint Edmund Campion that he was not attempting a scholar’s approach to his subject.

All I have sought to do is to select incidents which strike a novelist as important and to put them into a narrative which I hope may prove readable. The facts are not in dispute so I have left the text unencumbered by notes or bibliography. It should  be read as a simple, perfectly true story of heroism and holiness.

When we think of English Catholic martyrs nowadays, I think most thoughts turn to St. Thomas More – a man worth remembering, to be sure. Campion more than holds in own in such company. His apologia to the Queen’s Privy Council as he was undergoing persecution is provided by Waugh as a final chapter, too important to be designated an appendix. These are Campion’s own words, written as he knew his execution by the anti-Catholic government was a foregone conclusion:

And touching our Societie, be it known to you that we have made a league – all the Jesuits in the world, whose succession and multitude must overreach all the practices of England – cheerfully to carry the cross you shall lay, and never to despair your recovery, while we have a man left to enjoy your Tyburn, or to be racked with your torments, or consumed with your prisons. The expense is reckoned, the enterprise is begun; it is of God, it cannot be withstood. So the Faith was planted; so it must be restored.

…I have no more to say but to recommend your case and mine to Almightie God, the Searcher of Hearts, who send us His grace, and set us at accord before the day of payment, to the end we may at last be friends in Heaven, when all injuries shall be forgotten.

My edition of Saint Edmund Campion is a reprint from Sophia Institute Press from about twenty years ago; I’m sorry that the book is no longer listed in the publisher’s online catalog. Amazon.com steps into the breach with at least two editions.

Writing in the mid-1930s, Waugh in his Preface to Campion wrote presciently about how the sixteenth-century martyr would speak to us in our own day.

We have seen the Church driven underground in one country after another. The martyrdom of Father [now Blessed] Pro in Mexico re-enacted Campion’s. In fragments and whispers we get news of other saints in the prison camps of eastern and southeastern Europe, of cruelty and degradation more frightful than anything in Tudor England and of the same pure light shining in the darkness, uncomprehended. The hunted, trapped, murdered priest is amongst us again, and the voice of Campion comes to us across the centuries as though he were walking at our side.

Dueling rallies in Washington over Dobbs case

“Head to Washington to stand in front of the Supreme Court building for a few hours” was not on my to-do list for December, until the Dobbs case got to the Court.

Ellen Kolb's avatarLeaven for the Loaf

While the Dobbs case was being argued at the U.S. Supreme Court on December 1, two rallies were taking place outside. I went to Washington for the day in order to stand with the people calling on the Court to overturn Roe v. Wade and its cousin Planned Parenthood v. Casey.

Dobbs is about a Mississippi law setting a 15-week limit on abortions. May a state regulate abortion before viability? The Supreme Court might say yes or no. It might use the case to overrule Roe, or it might make a narrow ruling that OKs the Mississippi law while somehow keeping Roe and Casey in place. We’ll find out by the end of next June.

There were about two thousand people standing in front of the Supreme Court building on December 1, roughly evenly divided between pro-life and pro-Roe. A crowd-control fence divided the two groups, although there was…

View original post 209 more words